I hope to establish a new organization to do what the NRA or the Second Amendment Foundation are not doing: Defending the Second Amendment through the Common Defence, the Privileges and immunities and through the Tenth Amendment Power Reserved to the People Themselves. In other words National Open Carry is the essential component to the Common Defence.
On February 17, 2020 I mailed my Voluntary Interrogatory to the Secretary of Defense Dr. Mark T. Esper on the original intent of the Common Defence (original spelling in the Constitution) in relation to the Second Amendment and the Preamble to the United States Constitution. The Secretary of Defense has not returned his answers to me, yet. My questions require DOD research to answer.
My letter (interogatory) to the 7 Commissioners of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and the same letter to 34 foreign ambassadors from the Organization of American States (OAS) who are part of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to the United States (Washington DC) is my first correspondence to IACHR with questions for the Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and the U.S. Attorney General William Barr.
My human rights approach to the United States Constitution is my Critical Thinking & Occam’s Razor (Chisholm v. Georgia, (1793), (The First Constitutional Canon) declaring “the people are the sovereign of this country” with the Tenth Amendment Power Reserved to the People themselves to say what the Constitution means, AS WE MUST) is my approach as the best approach over the U.S. Supreme Court’s Marbury v, Madison‘s Judicial Review’s tunnel vision approach. In my opinion Marbury’s Judicial Review Is a theft of power from the Tenth Amendment Power Reserved to the People under Chisholm as the First Constitutional Canon. The Supreme Court has been hen pecking the Second Amendment issues like kernels of corn on the ground instead of looking at the field of corn to see the more important big picture (THE COMMON DEFENCE). (Psychological profile = Oppositional Defiant Disorder (DSM-5)). The Supreme Court has been committing treason against the Second Amendment for the last 200 years, if not that long then for the last 50~100 years.
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, at 404 (6 Wheaton 264) (1821)
“It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid, but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is to exercise our best judgment and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one.”
“Treason doth not prosper; what’s the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason.”
SOURCE: Sir John Harington, “Of Treason,” The letters and Epigrams of Sir John Harington . . . ,ed. Norman E, McClure, book 4, epigram 5, p. 255 (1977). The complete edition of his epigrams was published in 1618. Cited in Suzy Platt, ed., Respectfully Quoted: A Dictionary of Quotations Requested from the Congressional Research Service, Congressional Reference Division, Library of Congress, (1989), Quotation TREASON #1826, page 343.
THAT’S MY APPROACH AND I’M STYICKIN’ TO IT.