Home > Uncategorized > Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sets the Stage for New Maritime Treaty on the Human Right to Armed Self-Defense Against Piracy on the High Seas

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Sets the Stage for New Maritime Treaty on the Human Right to Armed Self-Defense Against Piracy on the High Seas

Wednesday, November 10, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

NEWS FOR THE NRA!

International Maritime Organization
4, Albert Embankment
London SE1 7SR (Near Lamberth)
United Kingdom

The International Maritime Organization (IMO)  is a specialized agency of the
United Nations and this is its headquarters building at 4 Albert Embankment SE1,
overlooking the River Thames by Lambeth Bridge. The IMO’s main task has been
to develop and maintain a comprehensive regulatory framework for shipping and
its remit today includes safety, environmental concerns, legal matters, technical
co-operation, maritime security and the efficiency of shipping. The bronze
sculpture at the front of the building depicts the seven metre high, ten-tonne
sculptured bow of a cargo ship with a lone seafarer on the deck, and serves as
an international memorial to the world’s seafarers, past, present and future.

This is the international stage to regain our Second Amendment rights to armed self-defense in the maritime arena. All the elements for the human right to armed self-defense are falling into place. Somali piracy rising to out of control levels has caused the United Nations to throw up their arms in defeat acknowledging that the navies of members states patroling the waters surrounding Somali are ineffective. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s démarche to maritime nations asking for information on their port state laws  on the carriage of self-defense weapons for vessels operating in high risk waters sets the foundation for a new maritime treaty for armed merchant vessels and crew to defend against piracy and armed robbery on the high seas. Now is the time to resurrect the Letters of Marque and Reprisal long dormant in the Constitution. We can bring back congressionally sanctioned privateers to deal with these pirates.

Hamrick v. United States, et al, U.S. District Court for DC, No. 1-0-857-JDB, Amended Admiralty/RICO Act Complaint filed October 29, 2010 is my Second Amendment case on this very subject. I have a standing request for the NRA, SAF, GOA, JPFO, and all the other Second Amendment groups and individuals to support my Second Amendment case in anyway they can. I have been pushing this case for 8 years now as an unrepresented civil plaintiff.

USCG Updates Information on Foreign Nations’ Policies Towards Weapons on US-Flag Commercial Vessels
Maritime Transportation Security News & Views
September 8, 2010

Last week, the US Coast Guard posted, on its Homeport website, an updated Port Information Matrix that summarizes available port state responses to a US State Department démarche requesting information on port state laws and restrictions on the carriage of self-defense weapons for vessels operating in high risk waters.  The new matrix, an attachment to Port Security Advisory (PSA) (08-09) “Port State Responses to Request for Information Regarding Carriage and Transport of Self-Defense Weapons Aboard U.S. Commercial Vessels,” replaces a previous version that had been updated in May.

Since I can’t find where I might have saved previous versions of the Matrix, I’m relying on a very fallible memory to suggest the latest changes.  I believe the listings for Djibouti, Guinea, India, Kenya, Mauritius, Nicaragua, Oman, and Tanzania are new.  Of these India and Tanzania allow neither weapons on board nor armed transits through the country between airports and vessels.  The other countries permit both under conditions, which are summarized in the new matrix.

To access the new matrix, or PSA (08-09), go to Homeport, click on “Counter Piracy” under “Featured Homeport Links” at the top of the right side of the page.  On the Counter Piracy page, scroll down to “PSA (8-09): Port State Response to Request for Information Regarding Carriage and Transport of Self-Defense Weapons Aboard U.S. Commercial Vessels and Port Information document.”  Clicking on that will provide a choice of PDF links for the updated Port Information Matrix and for  PSA (08-09).

State Dep’t & USCG Respond to Suez Canal Firearms Prohibition
Maritime Transportation Security News & Views
September 8, 2010

It has been reported that, about two months ago,  the Suez Canal Authority began enforcing a prohibition on merchant vessels transiting the Canal with firearms on board.  A vessel with weapons is now required to hand them over to Egyptian authorities, who then cause the firearms to be driven to the other end of the Canal, where the guns are returned to the ship.   In addition to other problems, the new policy places US vessels in violation of the export licenses they obtained from the State Department for the firearms, since the weapons leave the ship while she transits the Canal.

For those not initiated into the intricacies of US arms export control law, taking firearms1 on a commercial vessel leaving the US is deemed an export of the weapons under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), even though the weapons are for self-defense against pirates and will be brought back to the US when the ship returns.  As a result,  shipping companies usually have obtained Temporary Export Licenses for their self-defense weapons.  These licenses have required that the weapons remain on board the vessel in question all the time.  Thus, if the ship won’t give up her weapons, she can’t go through the Canal, but, if she does surrender the firearms temporarily, she’s in violation of the export license.  This could result in  fines and/or license revocation.

The State Department’s Office of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), which is responsible for the ITAR, has decided how to handle this situation and the Coast Guard has promulgated the guidance in Revision 4 of Port Security Advisory (PSA) 4-09, “INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN ARMS REGULATIONS (ITAR).”  PSA 4-09 Revision 4 differs from the previous version in that the following paragraph has been added:

For vessels likely to transit the Suez Canal, the DDTC recommends that DSP-73 applications for a temporary export license should list both Port Said Shipping and Navigation Company and the Egyptian Customs Authority as “Temporary Foreign Intermediate Consignees” in block 18. Companies with DSP-73s already approved should submit an amendment (DSP-74) to their existing license to add these two parties. This will help ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

This fix is fine as far as it goes, but what of other countries that adopt similar policies for the custody of weapons while US-flag vessels are in their territories?  For example, it has been reported that the UAE has indicated it will require any firearms to be transferred to government custody via small boat before a merchant vessel’s entry into port.  Presumably, a license amendment application listing as a “Temporary Foreign Intermediate Consignee” whatever entity the UAE government designates to take custody of such weapons would be acted on favorably by the DDTC.  If more countries adopt such policies, however, applications could get quite lengthy and it is often hard to predict well in advance what countries a ship may need to visit.  Perhaps DDTC could become comfortable with a more generic formulation such as “any entity designated by foreign government to take custody of the weapons while the ship is in that government’s territory.”

To access the full text of  PSA 04-09 (Rev. 4)), go to Homeport, click on “Counter Piracy” under “Featured Homeport Links” at the top of the right side of the page.  On the Counter Piracy page, scroll down to and click on “PSA 4-09 (Rev 4): International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).”  That will provide a PDF link to click on to actually get PSA 04-09 (Rev. 4).

____________________

1 Except for shotguns with barrels over 18 inches long (other than those “with certain combat features”), the export of which is regulated by the Department of Commerce.

Tip of the Hat: I learned of this Revision from my good friend Dennis Bryant’s most excellent information resource, Bryant’s Maritime Blog.

NOTE: This post may be copied, distributed, and displayed and derivative works may be based on it, provided  it is attributed to Maritime Transportation Security News and Views by John C. W. Bennett,http://mpsint.com

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: