JUDICIAL HIGH TREASON: Justice Thomas Admits U.S. Supreme Court “Evading” Obama Eligibility Issue
House Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government
Hearing: FY 2011 Budget Request for the U.S. Supreme Court
April 15, 2010, 10:00 AM, Room 2358A, Rayburn House Office Building
JUSTICE THOMAS: Well, [Smiling chuckle] and you don’t have to be born in the United States so you never have to answer that question.
REP. JOSE SERRANO (D-NY): Oh, really?
JUSTICE THOMAS: Yeah.
REP. JOSE SERRANO (D-NY): So you haven’t answered the one about whether I can serve as president but you answered this one.
JUSTICE THOMAS: We’re evading that one. [Laughing & Laughter from Audience] We’re giving you another option.
REP. JOSE SERRANO (D-NY): Thanks alot. [Smiling]
JUSTICE THOMAS: Thank you Mr. Chairman. [Justice Thomas having the last laugh]
REP. JOSE SERRANO (D-NY): Ms. Emerson …
Why is this Treason?
Justice Thomas’ admission that the U.S. Supreme Court is evading the Obama eligibility issue is going to create a hailstorm of protests! Keep watching the news on this one!
This is Judicial HIGH TREASON!
U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE FROM 1821:
Cohens v. Virginia 19 U. S. 264 (1821):
“It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary can not, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid, but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is to exercise our best judgment and conscientiously to perform our duty.”