Home > Uncategorized > My Emails to the “FEDs” about my “Citizen’s Arrest Warrant”

My Emails to the “FEDs” about my “Citizen’s Arrest Warrant”

Monday, August 27, 2007 Leave a comment Go to comments

Date: Aug 23, 2007 11:57 PM

More Evidence of Politicized Justice

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

The [below] is further evidence of “habit/routine practice” under the Federal Rules of Evidence that the federal courts and the US Department of Justice did, in fact and law, wrongfully obstruct justice in my cases because of politics spurred corruption. This should further urge the FBI to investigate the handling of my cases these past 5 years.

MUST READ: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1187859736495

Head of Civil Rights Division Resigns From Justice Department

by Lara Jakes Jordan
The Associated Press
August 24, 2007

The Justice Department’s top civil rights enforcer resigned Thursday following more than a year of criticism that his office filled its ranks with conservative loyalists instead of experienced attorneys.

Assistant Attorney General Wan J. Kim was the first immigrant and first Korean-American to head the department’s civil rights division — a post he held for just over two years.

Kim is the latest senior justice official to leave amid a scathing congressional investigation that has raised questions about the department’s political independence from the White House.

Kim had been rumored for months to be leaving the department, and is expected to join a private law firm. He worked at the department for over 10 years, starting as a criminal trial attorney, and was one of the few Senate-confirmed senior officials left.

“For over a decade now, Wan Kim has served the Department of Justice and the American people with distinction and honor,” U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said in a statement Thursday. “Wan has worked his way up through the department, and I will miss his honest opinions and valuable contributions as an adviser to me.”

The department’s civil rights division enforces federal laws prohibiting discrimination, including at work, at election polls and even at casinos. In May, Kim’s office settled with MGM Mirage Inc., the world’s second-largest casino company, for $55,000 over complaints that several of its hotels were not accessible to the handicapped.

Kim also pursued the illegal and exploitative trafficking of foreign women and children who were forced into slave labor in the U.S. — often working as prostitutes. His office helped reignite a decades-old murder case gone cold, winning a guilty conviction in June against a reputed Ku Klux Klansman who abducted two black teenagers in a long-ignored crime from Mississippi’s bloody past.

But Justice Department’s civil rights division has drawn criticism. Last year, a Boston Globe analysis of Justice Department hiring data found that the office had become highly politicized with the hiring of lawyers who had little civil rights experience but strong GOP credentials.

Moreover, critics contend that the office has largely focused on voter fraud cases — which civil rights groups charge are intended to hold down minority turnout.

In June, Kim testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the transfer of three minority female lawyers from his office’s voting rights section. The move had been directed by Bradley Schlozman, the former voting rights chief who also has resigned, effective last week.

During his testimony, Kim told senators that he had been concerned by the move and said remarks by Schlozman that appeared to question the women’s patriotism “were intemperate and inopportune.”

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy said Kim’s resignation was part of a mass exodus from the Justice Department that “must not hinder our efforts to demand accountability.”

“Too many questions have remained unanswered, too many civil rights laws have not been enforced and too many officials have resigned to evade the accountability that is to come for the disastrously flawed policies of this administration,” said Kennedy, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Justice Department said Kim’s office set record levels of civil rights enforcement, including winning the most criminal convictions in a single year over the past two decades. In addition, he filed more than twice the average number of voting rights lawsuits in a 12-month period than were filed annually over the past 30 years.

The Ten Worst U.S. Prosecutors Named:

Texas Leads List With Four

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/08-23-2007/0004650627&EDATE=

HOUSTON, Aug. 23 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — United States Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, was selected as the worst prosecutor out of 10 in the nation in 2007 for his involvement in the firings of nine U.S. Attorneys and the politicization of the Justice Department. At a close second, Texas ex-prosecutor Terry D. McEachern, who is best known for seeking unlawful cocaine possession charges against the African-American community of Tulia, Texas, and withholding exculpatory evidence. Next selected, former North Carolina D.A. Michael Nifong, for the widely-publicized debacle in the rape prosecution of Duke Lacrosse players causing his disbarment for having engaged in dishonesty, fraud, and withholding exculpatory information.

While a prosecutor’s job is to seek justice, there have been numerous instances in U.S. history where federal and state prosecutors have engaged in unethical conduct simply to secure a conviction where otherwise not possible if they had played “by the rules.” The “Ten Worst Prosecutors,” list carefully researched and produced by the Bennett Law Firm (BLF) in Houston, Texas, features a handful of recent occurrences where federal and state prosecutors did not play “by the rules” with respect to evidence in criminal trials and ruined the lives of innocent people to further their own professional careers.

The BLF and the “Bad Prosecutor Blog” website (visit: http://bennettlawfirm.typepad.com/badprosecutors) chose to recognize the ten worst prosecutors in the United States in 2007 to bring about an open discussion of prevalent prosecutorial misconduct, and most importantly, to stress the importance of holding bad prosecutors accountable for their unlawful indiscretions. For over thirty years, the BLF has been involved in criminal, civil, and administrative investigation. BLF Attorney Robert S. “Bob” Bennett, a former federal prosecutor, has been qualified as an expert on prosecutorial abuse and prosecutorial recusal. Mr. Bennett has also published numerous articles and has given countless speeches on these topics.

Prosecutorial misconduct ranges from hiding, destroying, or tampering with evidence, case files or court records; failing to disclose exculpatory evidence; using false or misleading evidence during trial; to improper behavior during grand jury proceedings. The BLF’s “Ten Worst” list exposes the harsh reality that bad prosecutors are not always disciplined for such misconduct and, in most cases, continue practicing law without missing a beat. The BLF and the website strongly believe that the list will heighten public awareness and, in turn, help curb unjust prosecutions and deter future prosecutorial misconduct.

Other bad prosecutors selected for the BLF “Ten Worst” list include the likes of Louisiana Attorney General Charles Foti, Jr., Massachusetts Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Auerhahn, Georgia Prosecutor David McDade, Oklahoma D.A. Bill Peterson, L.A. City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo, and Texas licensed attorneys: Charles Sebesta and Randall W. Reynolds.

Foti’s persistence in attempting to prosecute a doctor and two nurses after hurricane Katrina and making extrajudicial statements surrounding their guilt have secured him a spot on the BLF’s “Ten Worst” list. Auerhahn’s blatant disregard for the constitutional rights of an innocent man which resulted in a 22-year sentence and 13 years behind bars before it was ever discovered has earned him a listing as well. McDade was selected for overzealously prosecuting a 17-year-old over oral sex with a consenting 15-year-old girl under an archaic loophole in Georgia law (which has now been abolished) and for distributing a video of the sexual encounter in violation of federal child pornography laws.

Texas prosecutor, Charles Sebesta, makes an appearance on the list for presenting false, misleading evidence and not disclosing an exculpatory confession during the murder prosecution of Anthony Graves which resulted in his conviction and being sent to death row for capital murder in 1994. Ward County D.A., Randall W. Reynolds, was selected for dragging his feet in response to reliable allegations of sexual abuse of inmates at the West Texas State School in Pyote, Texas, and delaying the prosecution of two accused prison guards for more than 2 years.

Also selected was prosecutor Bill Peterson for inspiring John Grisham to write a novel about his vigorous yet erroneous prosecution and conviction of Ron Williamson for capital murder in 1988 on weak physical evidence and jailhouse informants. Last, but certainly not least, the list includes the Harvard-educated L.A. City Attorney, Rocky Delgadillo, who is best known for prosecuting famed Paris Hilton and publicly admitting that he misused public resources by negligently allowing his accident-prone wife to use a city vehicle for personal errands resulting in $1,200 of damage and then letting taxpayers foot the bill, all the while complaining about a two-tiered judicial system that gives “special treatment” to the privileged.

If you would like to obtain a copy of the BLF’s “Ten Worst Prosecutors” Article, please visit http://bennettlawfirm.typepad.com/badprosecutors or contact Scott Chauveaux at 713-225-6000; e-mail Schauveaux@bennettlawfirm.com. To contact BLF Attorney Bob Bennett, visit:

http://www.bennettlawfirm.com or email Bbennett@bennettlawfirm.com.

=====================

Date: Aug 24, 2007 9:37 AM

CITIZEN’S ARREST:

8th Circuit Committed a Felony

(CORRECTED COPY)

FROM EXTORTION VICTIM DON HAMRICK

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

(CAN THE US MARSHALS SERVICE FORWARD THIS SERIES OF EMAILS TO KRISTA JAFFE? HER EMAIL ADDRESS SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT.)

Docket Report 8th Circuit, Case No. 07-2400:

08/09/2007 PETITION for enbanc rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Don Hamrick.

08/14/2007 MEMORANDUM of Mr. Don Hamrick in support of petition for
enbanc rehearing, filed by Mr. Don Hamrick.

PLEASE NOTE that the 8th Circuit judges dismissed my appeal because I did not pay their filing fee knowing full well that I was exempt from their filing fee under 28 USC § 1916. That in itself is judicial misconduct; attempted felony extortion under 18 USC § 872; a violation of my Seventh Amendment rights. However, there is the possibility that the Court Clerk executed the dismissal Order without approval or knowledge of a judge because there is no judge’s name indicated on the dismissal Order, just the name and signature of the Court Clerk. If this suspicion is proven true then you have a Court Clerk dismissing a case without proper authority. Wouldn’t this be a felony crime suitable for arrest and prosecution?

FOR KRISTA JAFFE:

When you discover the evidence of extortion at the US Supreme Court PLEASE notify the 8th Circuit of your discovery and recommend to the 8th Circuit En Banc Panel that it would be in the interest of justice that they vacate their dismissal Order and explictly remand my case for trial (and overturn the lower court’s Order denying my several motions, including my amended complaint adding the United Nations as lead defendant).

Otherwise, another injustice will have been committed.

Signed: Don Hamrick
========================

Date: Aug 24, 2007 4:41 PM

Krista Jaffe’s Duty to File Amicus Curiae Brief with 8th Circuit

FROM EXTORTION VICTIM DON HAMRICK

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

(CAN THE US MARSHALS SERVICE FORWARD THIS SERIES OF EMAILS TO KRISTA JAFFE? HER EMAIL ADDRESS SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT.)

Krista Jaffe,

I know for a fact that you will find it to be true that the US Supreme Court violated its own Rule 40.2 and 28 USC § 1916 by compelling to pay their filing fee twice ($600 total). I even filed a Rule 22 pleading directly to Chief Justice Rhenquist who wrongfully denied my Rule 22 motion for the return of the filing fee. I construe that denial as part and partial of racketeering activities against the Second Amendment. Extortion is a predicate act of racketeering activity under the RICO Act.

When you discover that I am right about the filing fee you will then be duty bound to file an Amicus Curiae Brief with the 8th Circuit recommending they correct their errors in order to mitigate their criminal liability. Remember Operation Greylord? The FBI investigation into Chicago’s corrupt judicial system?

It will only take you 10 minutes to discover the truth. The question here is what will you do when you do discover the truth. Will you take action to defend my rights? Or simply do nothing as Dave Loyer, Deputy US Marshal, Little Rock did when I requested the US Marshals Service to research the topic of citizen’s arrest as applied against the US Government. That was last year. I haven’t heard from him or the USMS since then.

Now the ball is in your court. What are you going to do?

PLEASE DO IT ASAP!

I don’t want the 8th Circuit denying my Petition for Rehearing En Banc because you didn’t file your Amicus Curiae Brief.

===================

Date: Aug 25, 2007 2:45 AM

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF ON CITIZEN’S ARREST

[This email was henpecked by stylus on an HP IPAQ Pocket PC]

FROM EXTORTION VICTIM DON HAMRICK

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

(CAN THE US MARSHALS SERVICE FORWARD THIS SERIES OF EMAILS TO KRISTA JAFFE? HER EMAIL ADDRESS SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT.)

Below is my intended Motion to the 8th Circuit. But first I must give alarm that the US Marshals Service has apparently again imagine, exagerated, and fabricated an allegation in order to intimidate me from pursuing justice by citizen’s arrest with assistance of the FBI.

TEXT OF EMAIL FROM MY ELDERLY MOTHER IN ARKANSAS:

“A deputy from Heber came out here
the other day to ask if you were here.
Then he asked if I knew where you were.
I told him no, that the last e/mail
I got from you was from No. Carolina. He
said something about you contacting
someone and threatening to kill them
` or something to that effect.”

THREAT ASSESSMENT

The purpose of my visit with the staff of US Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas was to politely break the stalemate with federal law enforcement because I cannot lawfully make a citizen’s arrest without assistance of the FBI. I told the US Marshals Service that I intended to do everything in accordance with the law because I want to set a legal precedent for semen’s rights under 28 USC § 1916.

Now someone in the US Marshals Service appears to be trying to set me up for a kill shot as a criminal suspect when all I am doing as acting as an attorney would in the interest of justice.

DISCLAIMER: I hereby proclaim my innocence. I categoricly deny any an all allegations that I made a threat against anyone.

The only threat I see is that [somepeople are] trying to silence me, to keep me from going to trial. That they have corruptively persuaded judges to deny my every motion and dismiss my cases although the DC Circuit remanding my case on Second Amendment grounds was a surprise.Why is the US Marshals Service hunting me down everytime I take a significant step with Citizen’s Arrest and the steps I take are well within the law as evidenced by my intended motion below?Does the US Marshals Service have something to hide?The actions of the US Marshal Service is like some cheap movie thriller.Do I need to run to the FBI for their witness protection program?What a hoot! If the US Marshals Service cannot find any wrongdoing in my citizen’s arrest activities they appear determine to fabricate something to destroy my legal standing to pursue my SEcond Amendment case and my Citizen’s Arrest activities.

HEY KRISTA! Who’s threatening who now?

[text of intended motion to 8th Circuit]

====================

Date: Aug 25, 2007 8:08 AM

IS THE US MARSHALS SERVICE

A BUNCH OF CORRUPT GOONS?

FROM EXTORTION VICTIM DON HAMRICK

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

(CAN THE US MARSHALS SERVICE FORWARD THIS SERIES OF EMAILS TO KRISTA JAFFE? HER EMAIL ADDRESS SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT.)

WOW!

What is the US Marshals Service up to?

I am trying to get my “complaint of extortion” of filing fees by federal court clerks and federal judges verified and validated so that I can lawfully proceed with citizen’s arrest because the FBI refuses to acknowledge the validity of 28 USC § 1916.

Because every federal law enforcement agency I email refuses to correspond in kind I must travel to Washington, DC to get answers. And now because I took substantial steps the US Marshals Service appears to be trying to intimidate me into giving up on my cases for the Second Amendment and my extortion claims.

If it is true that the US Marshals Service visited my elderly mother or had the Cleburne County Sheriff send a Deputy the question is why?

The US Marshals Service is fully aware of my extortion claims. They have had more than enough time to investigate my claims in the past 4 years and yet they say nothing and do nothing about it but harass my family in retaliation.

Why?

Is the US Marshals Service protecting the criminal activties of the federal courts?

Is the US Marshals Service so corrupt that they will protect federal judges and court personnel who break federal laws?

Are the US Marshals Service and the federal courts really that corrupt?

Is the US Marshals Service so corrupt that they will turn an innocent civil plaintiff into a criminal suspect by issuing fabricated allegations just because the civil plaintiff is defending his statutory, civil, and constitutional rights?

Or is the US Marshals Service just a bunch of dangerous idiots?

How many times do I have to tell the US Marshals Service that I willdo everything in accordance with the law, staying within the law as I pursue verification and validation of my Citizen’s Arrest Warrant. But maybe that’s exact what the US Marshals Service doesn’t want – me holding federal judges accountable for extortion.

===============

Date: Aug 25, 2007 7:35 PM

DIRTY TRICK BY US MARSHALS SERVICE

FROM EXTORTION VICTIM DON HAMRICK

TO KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT

CC: EVERYONE ELSE!

(CAN THE US MARSHALS SERVICE FORWARD THIS SERIES OF EMAILS TO KRISTA JAFFE? HER EMAIL ADDRESS SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT.)

UPDATE/CLARIFICATION:

Remember that high school social studies classroom experiment where the teacher would give a short message to the first student in the first seat of the first row and that message was whispered front to back and back to front row by row to the last student in the back seat of the last row to end up getting en entirely different message.

So it is with the US Martials Service Little Rock sending a message to the Cleburne County Sheriff’s Department to question my elderly mother on my whereabouts. This was done because I did not show up at the steps of the US Supreme Court at the self-appointed time. I couldn’t get there on time.

The Cleburne County Deputy Sheriff that was sent out to question my elderly mother apparently embellished his own assignment by inferring a threat of his own fabrication alleging that I threatened to kill someone. COMPLETELY THE FIGMENT OF THE DEPUTY SHERIFF’S IMAGINATION POSSIBLY BECAUSE HE SAW A CAREER ADVANCE OPPORTUNITY AT THE EXPENSE OF MY REPUTATION. JUST ANOTHER DIRTY TRICK OF THE US MARSHALS SERVICE!!!THE US MARSHALS SERVICES HAS MY EMAIL ADDRESS AND I INSTRUCTED THEM TO CONTACT ME WHEN THEY HAD QUESTIONS FOR ME!!!THE US MARSHALS SERVICE IS NOT PLAYING BY THE RULES!!!

THEY HAVE GIVEN ME GROUNDS TO BRING CIVIL ACTION FOR VIOLATING MY CIVIL RIGHTS, DEFAMATION, HARASSMENT, AIDING AND ABETTING EXTORTION AND WHATEVER ELSE I CAN ALLEGE!!!

TO ALL FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES:

LEAVE MY ELDERLY MOTHER OUT OF THIS!!!

YOU WANT TO KNOW MY INTENTIONS YOU EMAIL ME DIRECTLY!!! I WILL ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS!!!

ARE YOU FEDS THAT DAMN BELLIGERENTLY PARANOID THAT YOU FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BELIEVE THAT A CITIZEN CAN ACT WITHIN THE LAW OR HAS THE RIGHT TO LAWFULLY PURSUE JUSTICE AS AN EXTORTION VICTIM WHEN “THE FEDS” ACT TO PROTECT THE JUDICIAL EXTORTIONISTS??

NOW ARE YOU FEDS READY TO DEAL WITH ME AS THE GUARDIANS AND PROTECTORS OF THE INNOCENT THAT YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE?

I NEED AND PREFER VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF MY CITIZEN’S ARREST WARRANT BY KRISTA JAFFE, US SUPREME COURT POLICE, THREAT ASSESSMENT UNIT OR BY THE FBI.

CONTINUED REFUSAL BY YOU FEDS TO CORRESPOND WITH ME TO RESOLVE MY EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING ALLEGATIONS WILL BE CONSTRUED AS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BECAUSE I AM ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

I AM ASKING FOR YOUR HELP! WHY ARE YOU FEDS REMAINING SILENT?

IF YOU FEDS (FBI IN PSRTICULAR) REFUSE THE HELP ME (CORRESPONDING AND SCHEDULING THE CITIZEN’S ARREST EVENT) I WILL ANNOUNCE A DATE AND TIME FOR THE EVENT.

WORK WITH ME PLEASE!
WORK WITH ME PLEASE!
WORK WITH ME PLEASE!

================

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: