Home > Uncategorized > To Federal Law Enforcement in Washington DC: Notice of Intent to Make Citizen’s Arrests of Federal Judges

To Federal Law Enforcement in Washington DC: Notice of Intent to Make Citizen’s Arrests of Federal Judges

Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments
TO:
Lanny A. Breuer, Assistant. Attorney General
Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20531-0001
Tel: (202) 514-2601
Jack Smith, Chief,
Public Integrity Section,
Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20531-0001
Tel: (202) 514-1412
Robert Mueller, Director
FBI
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001
(202) 324-3000
John Clark, Director
U.S. Marshals Service
Washington, DC 20530
U.S. Supreme Court Police
One First Street NE
Washington, D.C 20543
Tel: (202)479-3211
Phillip D. Morse, Sr., Chief
U.S. Capitol Police
119 D. Street, NE
Washington, DC 20510
Notice of Intent to Make Citizen’s Arrest of Federal Judges
Based on Probable Cause Evidence of Extortion
As Authorized by DC Code § 23-582(b)(1)(A) and
DC Code § 23-582(c)
(NOTE: A CITIZEN’S ARREST DONE WITHIN THE LAW
BUT PREVIOUSLY BLOCKED BY LOW-LEVEL FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS )
Click the above link to read my October 7th letter that I mailed today, October 27, to the above federal law enforcement agencies. The letter presents my legal argument that proves I have a legal right to make citizen’s arrests of federal judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit and the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court for Felony Extortion (18 U.S.C. § 872) of filing fees that are supposed to be exempt for a U.S. merchant seaman under the Seamen’s Suit law (28 U.S.C. § 1916). My assertion of a legal right to make citizen’s arrests of federal judges for extortion of filing fees of federal courts rests on whether there is an implied private right of action to the Seamen’s Suit law. Congress gave U.S. merchant seamen their statutory right of exemption from fees and costs of the federal courts. But Congress did not explicitly state a private right of action for seamen to enforce that right through civil action or other means such as citizen’s arrest as a means of last resort. Because I have exhaust all available administrative and judicicial (motions) means I am left with the means of last legal result: citizen’s arrest.

Over the last 8 years of federal litigation the the U.S. District Court in Little Rock, Arkansas, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court wrongfully and illegally coerced (extorted) their respective filing fees from me, a fully documented U.S. merchant seaman filing a Second Amendment case that qualifies for the Seamen’s Suit exemption of fees and costs under the safety clause. The combined amount of filing fees of these federal courts totals somewhere between $1,800 and $1,900. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit in St. Louis, Missouri issued their Court Order compelling me to pay their filing fee or my appeal from the U.S. District Court in Little Rock, Arkansas would not be placed on the Docket. I refused to pay in defence of the Seamen’s Suit exemption. The 8th Circuit rejected my appeal. That, in my opinion, is a criminal racketeering act of Obstruction of Justice under the RICO Act.

Up until now I have been dealing with the foot soldiers of federal law enforcement agencies, the low-level federal agents and their supervisors all which who stand by the idea that federal judges and their court personnel cannot be subjected to citizen’s arrests under any circumstances regardless of the probable cause evidence. Today I have placed the heads of federal law enforcement agencies on notice to prove why I cannot make citizen’s arrests of federal judges when probable cause evidence of extortion of filing fees from a U.S. merchant seaman exists.
The mailing of this letter coincides with the Tuesday, October 26th UPS shipping of my Amended Admiralty/RICO Act Complaint to the U.S. District Court for DC which includes the first section titled, “In Protest for Biased Dismissal of Original Complaint.” The Amended Complaint is scheduled to be delivered to the Washington DC federal court Friday, October 29th. The Amended Complaint can be downloaded in the next article above.

In my 8-years of federal litigation for the Second Amendment rights of U.S. merchant seaman to openly keep and bear arms in intrastate and interstate travel and to arm U.S. merchant vessels and crew to defend against pirates on the high seas the NRA, Second Amendment Foundation, JPFO, Gun Owners of America, Second Amendment Sisters, and every other Second Amendment advocacy group has declined to even publish Op-Eds about my case, let alone financial back my case or provide representation. Now hear I am throwing down the challenge to federal law enforcement agencies in Washington, DC to prove why I cannot make citizen’s arrest of federal judges for felony extortion of exempted filing fees derived from the filing a my Second Amendment cases. Where are all these Second Amendment advocacy groups for me?

National Open Carry is still the constitutional norm even though it may not be the social norm nor the legal norm today. Do I have to get myself arrested before the NRA and other Second Amendment groups get interested?
About these ads
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: